| 000 | 01905nab a22001817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ES-MaBCA | ||
| 005 | 20171102131925.0 | ||
| 008 | 120330t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aES-MaBCA _cES-MaBCA |
||
| 100 |
_915018 _aEisenfeld, Beth |
||
| 245 |
_aThe Intelligence Dilemma _h[Recurso electrónico] PDF _b: Proximity and Politicization-Analysis of External Influences |
||
| 520 | _aThe relationship between policy-making and strategic intelligence is a source of ongoing discourse. Although there is an abundance of literature about the relationship between consumers and producers of intelligence, consensus as to the relationship between policy makers and intelligence producers is lacking. The two concepts–proximity and politicization–represent the intelligence dilemma that leads to claims of politicization, a word with many interpretations. Most observers of the democratic policy-making process are familiar with the traditional potential sources of politicization yet those sources are not the only potential sources of politicization and there is a paucity of literature about external influences and the politicization of intelligence. In democracies, governed by the people through their elected representatives, many individuals and groups interact with policymakers to influence decisions. This article provides a framework for understanding sources of politicization external to the intelligence community. It identifies an outside-in influence and uses three examples to show how this type of stimulus contributes to the politicization of intelligence. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_9960 _aSeguridad |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_91181 _aAnalisis de inteligencia |
|
| 773 | 0 |
_aJournal of Strategic Security _g. -- Vol 10 No. 2 (june 2017), p. 77-96 _iEn : _tJournal of Strategic Security _w328 _x1944-0472 |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1583&context=jss | |
| 942 |
_2udc _cAN |
||
| 999 |
_c20254 _d20257 |
||